Get me a count of how many missiles out-range NATO's ground based ATGMs.
Off the top of my head we have the T-62M-1 and M-V, there's two, the T-80U and the next lowest T-80, there's four, and the Shturm, making it five. The rest tend to max out around 2626m now, perfectly within I-TOW range. T-80s need to be within a closer range than their max missile range to get the most amount efficiency out of them, so... Where we goin' with this? These are kinda of supposed to be the game's sniper missiles, I guess, hence why we've seen their price adjusted but stats not so much as touched (T-62s).
Nearly every single one of those units, like every single one of the AP over 13 units on NATO I-TOW jeeps aside, all cost over 50 points, making it pretty worthwhile to kill groups of these units with fairly extreme amounts of prejudice. Nearly every PACT unit which has an AP 13 or more breaks the 50 point barrier a piece as well.
Now, then, lemme put it this way: if you're camping and in some tight little hole like TheWord suggests the game leads out to, which keep in mind this sort of suggestion is likely more for his benefit than how he actually feels, you're going to be pushed into a box where the real advantage PACT has over NATO on the ground becomes apparent: ground based exceptional recon coupled with pot-shots. Enjoy being shot at by ATGMs you can't see but who can see you, even while you've got recce. Hell, they're probably shooting ATGMs at your very good recce vehicles.
As a whole, with NATO, if you aren't maneuvering against PACT, you're losing, this was the same as before this patch, arguably less with the heavy tank prevalence, moreso with the patches and states of the meta before that. That is, at least, if who's playing PACT is worthwhile. Besides, it tends to be more beneficial to PACT to be on the side that isn't pushing but being pushed, obviously vice-versa for NATO.
If you feel this is unbalanced, than I think the only thing we need to tip it to where it should be is:
If they make any changes to ATGM I'd prefer to see it on hit percentage of moving vehicles to encourge this NATO tactic.
Preferably on more than just ATGMs; it would be better if everything had a lower chance to be hit by everything shooting at it while moving.