Kamfrenchie, just... Read it again, and maybe try reading this post, you might start to understand.
What's this bs ?
Answer my points dude wtf. You didn't befor, and you contradict yourself.
You ignore our points and just bring it back to bastion atgm vs other atgm with different prices and characteristics
WP missiles tanks making duals with atgm carriers wtf are you on ? And how many i-tow jeep can i get for1 bastion t62 ?
That's it, your crediblity is shrinking because of all the nonsense you put up.
NATO, now, has generally an easy time mopping up enemy tanks heavy with medium tanks; indeed, they perform leaps and bounds better than basically everything NATO has to offer in their ATGM lists that isn't mounted on a helicopter, and this in part based on the amount of priority placed on taking down heavy tanks (such great distractions).
Boogie Van wrote:I'm terribly sorry, I made a few mistakes pronouns; do context clues help you to point that units like Leopards generally can't stop engaging whatever they've got in front of them to deal with others threats like T-62M-1s?
so 1leo 2A4 cant beat oth a t80U and a bastion T62 ? color me surprised !
That's more points for pact, unbalanced scenario
Leo2A4 could have a tank or atgm escort engaging T62AMV whatever.
OR YOU COULD USE CHALLENGER TO "TANK "
Or not use tank as a counter to atm all the time, because atgm are counter to tank. without range advantage they have nothing