It is currently Sun 26 May 2013 00:46

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed 14 Mar 2012 17:36 
Offline
Colonel

Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2011 01:53
Posts: 2594
unkelek wrote:
Ah, I see what you did there ;)


Lied? Why so surprised? Hell they've been doing that for the entire topic! :P

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 14 Mar 2012 18:26 
Offline
That was soooo easy
User avatar

Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 22:37
Posts: 1129
Location: Russia
Guggy wrote:
unkelek wrote:
Ah, I see what you did there ;)


Lied? Why so surprised? Hell they've been doing that for the entire topic! :P

Dude-dude-dude. Dude... Dude, this is a serious charge and you must prove it. When you tell that we lies you mast give your version with your facts, dude, we serious peoples here. It's almost an insult.

_________________
Hitler's reaction on Ultimate patch
Soul of Wargame
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 14 Mar 2012 22:06 
Offline
That was soooo easy
User avatar

Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 22:37
Posts: 1129
Location: Russia
unkelek wrote:
Romiros wrote:
Thank you ;) You tell facts - that's very important, I will never lie to you guys.

You are not lying just omitting some important facts.
What do you understand as slowed down process of dissolution on houses of prisoners of war? In fact, execution of almost 22 000 people is some kind of terminal slow down...

I just must say this - it was the Germans. :geek:
unkelek wrote:
Romiros wrote:
Only if you promise to read explanations and think about them. Without old-fashioned stereotypes, using only logic and common sense.

Sure, I am dying of curiosity.

First thing that you need to remember when you reading something about talvisota it's why there wasn't communistic party in Finland. Because most of reds was killed or prisoned in early 20th and red parties was just illegal (Another side of coin that communists parties was in most cases was under control of Comintern and that guys was freaking red Al-Qaeda). Finland was hostile to USSR. It's historical fact. We and Finland was like US and Cuba. Only we had ground border. Now watch and think what any different country did in our place.
1) Government of your nearest neighbor - your enemy
2) They can destroy your main industrial center and port by artillery without crossing their own borders.
3) They negotiate with German (who build their air force) and Japan. Japan is enemy of USSR, Germany is head of Anti-Comintern Pact. You can call it Russian paranoia, but
Quote:
Colonel P. Faymonville, the United States military attache in
Moscow, reported
to Washington on September 23, 1937: "The Soviet Union's most urgent
military
problem is to prepare to repel a simultaneous attack by Japan in the
East and
Gennany, together with Finland, in the West."

4) 1 September 1939 race between Reich and Union began.
5) 13 September - France forces retreat from German territory to Maginot Line
6) 17 September - RKKA started Polish campaign
7) 28 September - corresponding agreement between SU and Estonia. Not a single political claim was made.
8) 5 October - same with Latvia again - no political claims. Same day we asked Finns about their position.
9) 10 October -Lithuania joined to Union deck.
10) 12 October - Finland started mobilization. Not so long time ago it was enough for declaration of war.
11) 13 November - Finn delegation leaved Moscow. After they cross border soviet border guards was fired by finns.
What followed next you know. 28 November non-agression pact was denounced by SU. That was in fact declaration of war. 30 November troops crossed border. Germans asked Finnish government to give up. Army asked Finnish government to give up. Poland experience asked Finnish government to give up - Brits and French will not come to help. But Finns government didn't listen. Tell me where was our fault? What we did wrong? What should we did?

_________________
Hitler's reaction on Ultimate patch
Soul of Wargame
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 11:56 
Offline
First Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 31 Aug 2011 19:53
Posts: 248
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Romiros wrote:
I just must say this - it was the Germans. :geek:

In the 1990 your governemnent admitted to be responsible for this genocide (though they didn't call it genocide).
Romiros wrote:
What followed next you know. 28 November non-agression pact was denounced by SU. That was in fact declaration of war. 30 November troops crossed border. Germans asked Finnish government to give up. Army asked Finnish government to give up. Poland experience asked Finnish government to give up - Brits and French will not come to help. But Finns government didn't listen. Tell me where was our fault? What we did wrong? What should we did?

You forgot to add to your timeline signing the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact. You forgot to add that the communists party in Finland was banned due to unsuccessful revolution.
The Baltic countries were forced to join Soviet Union under the threat of war, they had no choice other than accept it. Finland on the other hand refused it and statistics we can say they won this war. It was Soviets who started artillery barrage on their own village and denouncing non-aggresion pact doesn't mean declaration of war.
Finally, Finland may have been hostile to SU but according to soviet policy everyone (even their countrymen) were hostile to Soviet Union.

_________________
Member of the No Unit Community.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 14:22 
Offline

Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2011 10:10
Posts: 375
Ribbentrop & Molotov; it's so funny to remember that Stalin was kneeling before Hitler, and discovered the man real intention with Barbarossa... Secret Service of URSS was too occupied to hunt civil opponent within borders, to understand the threat...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 18:26 
Offline
That was soooo easy
User avatar

Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 22:37
Posts: 1129
Location: Russia
unkelek wrote:
You forgot to add to your timeline signing the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact. You forgot to add that the communists party in Finland was banned due to unsuccessful revolution.

I did not include Molotov-Ribbentrop pact because with it I must include Munich Agreement and very large material about British and French. Maybe later. We have topic about the Soviet-Finnish relations and not about all pre-war diplomacy.
unkelek wrote:
The Baltic countries were forced to join Soviet Union under the threat of war, they had no choice other than accept it.

In 1939 they were not. I special point you that our agreement with Baltic countries didn't have political claims.
unkelek wrote:
It was Soviets who started artillery barrage on their own village

You can't prove it just like I can't disprove it. Finns tells that battery moved to area after shots, we tells that it was on position before. You do not believe to the official Soviet documents, we do not believe to Mannerheim's and Khrushchev memoirs, which are used as the source by Finns.
unkelek wrote:
denouncing non-aggresion pact doesn't mean declaration of war.

De jure - yes it was not, de facto - it was.
unkelek wrote:
Finland may have been hostile to SU but according to soviet policy everyone (even their countrymen) were hostile to Soviet Union.

agroq wrote:
Ribbentrop & Molotov; it's so funny to remember that Stalin was kneeling before Hitler, and discovered the man real intention with Barbarossa... Secret Service of URSS was too occupied to hunt civil opponent within borders, to understand the threat...

Image
Still you didn't tell me what should we do? Criticizing - offer.

_________________
Hitler's reaction on Ultimate patch
Soul of Wargame
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 19:13 
Offline
Specialist

Joined: Sun 19 Feb 2012 06:44
Posts: 11
:(


Last edited by OpusTheFowl on Sun 27 May 2012 03:56, edited 1 time in total.
Piontless and TOS violation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 19:35 
Offline
First Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 31 Aug 2011 19:53
Posts: 248
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Romiros wrote:
I did not include Molotov-Ribbentrop pact because with it I must include Munich Agreement and very large material about British and French. Maybe later. We have topic about the Soviet-Finnish relations and not about all pre-war diplomacy.

You should because this is the reason of Soviet-Finnish conflict.
Romiros wrote:
In 1939 they were not. I special point you that our agreement with Baltic countries didn't have political claims.

They all come to Stalin on their knees begging for loose their independence? :D

Quote:
Still you didn't tell me what should we do? Criticizing - offer.

You shouldn't have signed Ribentrop-Molotov and share Europe with Hitler.

_________________
Member of the No Unit Community.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 15 Mar 2012 20:27 
Offline
That was soooo easy
User avatar

Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 22:37
Posts: 1129
Location: Russia
unkelek wrote:
Romiros wrote:
I did not include Molotov-Ribbentrop pact because with it I must include Munich Agreement and very large material about British and French. Maybe later. We have topic about the Soviet-Finnish relations and not about all pre-war diplomacy.

You should because this is the reason of Soviet-Finnish conflict.
Romiros wrote:
In 1939 they were not. I special point you that our agreement with Baltic countries didn't have political claims.
They all come to Stalin on their knees begging for loose their independence? :D

They was joined to Union by force in 1940. But we talking about situation in 1939. In 1939 they was independent.
unkelek wrote:
Romiros wrote:
Quote:
Still you didn't tell me what should we do? Criticizing - offer.

You shouldn't have signed Ribentrop-Molotov and share Europe with Hitler.

We tried to make pact with Britain, with France even with Poland. All our initiatives were buried. Most part by Poland. (I can post in details, by it's long text, if you and others interested I can translate, but i think we already had a lot of runglish text here :oops: ) First negotiation started 14 December 1933(!) last started 18 august 1939 and representatives of France and Britain had no authority to sign anything!

_________________
Hitler's reaction on Ultimate patch
Soul of Wargame
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 26 May 2012 22:28 
Offline
General

Joined: Sun 6 Nov 2011 00:00
Posts: 6562
Interesting Troll thread.

_________________
Image
We need more missilez code for the missilez god.
Praslovan:
"Tactical Ikalugin inbound on this position in 10... 9..."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: haltendehand and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group