It is currently Tue 21 May 2013 22:06

Board index » Wargame series » Wargame : European Escalation

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 4
  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
THEDAMNRUSSIANS
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 02:08 
Offline
Warrant Officer

Joined: Thu 15 Mar 2012 16:56
Posts: 466
i recognize that the upper tier t80's are fine where they are but a 90 dollar base tank that has the range buff is ridiculous the cheapest nato tank with that is 100 and lacks the armor of the t80 a more comparable armor and stats standpoint is the super patton which costs the same and is slightly more accurate but lacks the range buff and has less armor which is a huge disadvantage(granted i don't use them) bumping the t80 to low 100's seems more reasonable or maybe even reverting the base model to 1975 again
Top
 Profile  
 
Jirik
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 06:26 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Wed 4 Apr 2012 06:43
Posts: 49
One ninety-dollar tank, please. Visa OK? ;-)

Base T-80 is a cost effective tank, that's all. Unlike T80B, unlike T72B etc. NATO's closest match is KpZ70, which is not really close. I don't agree with any price increase of the base T80; no one would field it anymore (not that many people field it right now) unless it got something extra in return.
Top
 Profile  
 
johnsushant
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 06:55 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2012 06:30
Posts: 277
What it makes up in armour it loses in accuracy. The base accuracy is bad and bad stabalizers don't help.
It can definitely get lucky with its shots but that is sheer luck and cannot be reproduced.
Top
 Profile  
 
Misfit
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 07:25 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 20 Apr 2012 19:02
Posts: 1025
No, leave pact at least one top tank that didnt get a cost increase because of "OP" ATGMs.
Top
 Profile  
 
D-M
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 15:03 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat 23 Jul 2011 10:10
Posts: 2497
Misfit wrote:
No, leave pact at least one top tank that didnt get a cost increase because of "OP" ATGMs.



Err wut ? Since when the T-80 got ATGMs ? And the majority of ATGM tanks didn't got any price increase, only one actually did.

_________________
Quote:
I have some bad news for young people entering the workforce: You're all a bunch of weenies, and we don't like you.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 15:20 
Offline
Chief Warrant Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 10:40
Posts: 542
If T-80's get a price hike, Leo2's should get one too. Both are basically the ultimate beast which has no weakness...

And the last thing this game needs is more NATO Leo2 rushes...
Top
 Profile  
 
D-M
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 15:45 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat 23 Jul 2011 10:10
Posts: 2497
Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:
If T-80's get a price hike, Leo2's should get one too. Both are basically the ultimate beast which has no weakness...

And the last thing this game needs is more NATO Leo2 rushes...



Because their side armor is indeed no weakness.


Last edited by OpusTheFowl on Tue 29 May 2012 15:55, edited 1 time in total.
Language


Top
 Profile  
 
REDDQ
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 17:21 
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2012 02:13
Posts: 2378
Location: Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa
D-M wrote:
Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:
If T-80's get a price hike, Leo2's should get one too. Both are basically the ultimate beast which has no weakness...

And the last thing this game needs is more NATO Leo2 rushes...



Because their side armor is indeed no weakness.

Exactly :D :lol:

_________________
Image
http://www.wargame.com.pl/ - Polska strona o WARGAME!!!
Air Force and AA defense of NSWP NEED URGENT FIX!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
varis
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 17:58 
Offline
Major
User avatar

Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2012 15:52
Posts: 1945
It's not strong enough for its armor and weapons to go against the higher-tier heavy tanks. Even against the AMX-32 it seems to lose duels.

You're looking in the wrong place for your balancing.

_________________
ImageImageImage
Fix decks and save minor nations - viewtopic.php?f=91&t=28335
Top
 Profile  
 
Misfit
PostPosted: Tue 29 May 2012 18:52 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 20 Apr 2012 19:02
Posts: 1025
D-M wrote:
Misfit wrote:
No, leave pact at least one top tank that didnt get a cost increase because of "OP" ATGMs.



Err wut ? Since when the T-80 got ATGMs ? And the majority of ATGM tanks didn't got any price increase, only one actually did.


T-80 doesnt have ATGMs, thats why it is one of the only cheap top tanks for pacts and should stay that way.

I really dont know how you could read something else into my sentence. :shock:
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 4
  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » Wargame series » Wargame : European Escalation

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group