The support team did not take their responsibility to make more patch.
We don't need the DLC which just includes several new map, the support team must let us see the value of every unit. The WEE is not as interesting as before the patch which changed the high-level tank's fire range. The fire range patch let many units lost their value,such as T-55 series, T-62series,Chieftain MK2 and Chieftain MK5 and so on. I don't know who want to use the above tank now, thay have no any value after the fire range patch, isn't it? The fire range patch is so stupid and it will destroy the WEE slowly, did not the support team see the number of players are decreased?

So what is we really need? We need more beautiful unit model, more balance patch for the "rubbish" units. Don't say "the rubbish is rubbish, why the rubbish need their value?" If the support team wants to say it, i will ask the support team"why you put those units in this game!"

I really love this game, so don't give up it and let me feel you are cheating me. If you think " any way, we already took money from the players, so we don't need pay much attention any more." Ok, i will not buy any game of Eugen System any more and i will tell my friends that the Eugen System just has a support service after you paid the money for the game.

1. This game didn't sell millions, so we should be thankful we're getting something free and hope that it was enough to keep Eugen systems afloat.

2. Patches are not over yet. They also need time to analyze their telemetry and even more importantly, people need to learn the damn game before this telemetry can be of any value.

3. IMO, heavy tanks should keep more range. It makes them feel more modern. Range differences between 2 colliding have been an essential part of tank battles ever since - it's about how the side with lower weapon range deal with the situation. Without them, they'd be much more boring - I actually want more (right now, we only have 1925 m and 2275 m ranges for main cannons), it would make things a bit more interesting. If heavy tanks must be nerfed (of which I'm not sure just yet), it should be elsewhere - armor, AP...

_________________

Sorry, but this is pretty badly argued. Where exactly did Eugen let us down? I mean, seriously, name one company in the last 3 years who did such an amazing after release support? To call a free DLC (with the second one in the works) and quite a lot of patches "cheating on you" is just unfair to the developers. If you want to hop on the Nerf-Heavy-Tanks-Range-Wave please do so in the big thread.

_________________
Newest Video on my channel: Wargame: AirLand Battle | Playing the Danes with Firestarter
Basic Tutorial for Newbies: Wargame: AirLand Battle | The Very Basics

I think, actually, they've said all the DLC they're making is going to be free.

I hope they make a full on expansion pack to the game so I can throw more money at them without buying another copy of it. ;.;

_________________

Game as it is now is OK balanced. Sure it could be better. But it was far worst.
About tank rant... i got my Leo2A4 killed by T62 with one shot today... how you use them is what counts.


Valve
Dice
Relic

There are plenty of them... now while he exaggerates in a bad way you exaggerate in complimenting them. Both ways are rather inappropriate. Implementing stuff after release (flares) that should be in release is not what should be labeled as good support... UI is designed poorly and
lag OMG lag... just played 4v4 all people had full ping bars... it lagged as hell itself it took 5 seconds after smerch barrage landed on CV to register a kill.

_________________
How to derail a thread with style:

I agree with you.

There have to be some changes to be made to keep this game in a healthy status.

The last patch made by Eugen System just killed those low tier tanks. I totally agree with you. Reasons are stated below:

1. High tier tanks can fire at their maximum effective range(2275m) on low tier tanks while those low tier tanks do not stand a chance to return fire(if they can penetrate their armour).

2. Low tier tanks have to advance 300m towards high tier tanks to be able to fire. And thanks to their low speed, this usually take up to 20 seconds. And at the meantime, T-80U can fire 3 rounds and L2A4 can fire 2 rounds.

3. Even if they have made their way to be close enough to enter effective gun range, they still cannot fire. Why? Because their pathetic guns can't even penetrate high tier tanks' superior armour!

4. Thank god they have been running for decades and eventually they can fire! And they can penetrate enemy's front armour. HOWEVER, they are usually dead or half-dead if they are lucky enough not being hit by T-80U's 11 AP cannon or L2A4's 10 AP cannon.

Now we are pretty clear how useless they are, aren't we?

Well, you might say that we can use low tier tanks like T-64 series(excludes T-64BV) and T-72 series(also excludes T-72B) to flank thos high tier tanks, their side armours are weak enough to be penetrated at 1925m!

Yes! I do agree with you, that's what I did in combat! But how about T-55s and T-62s? pff man, they are screwed.

And also, as a PACT player, I have some other bullocks about current situation about Warsaw pact tanks.

Ok, why are there only 2 T-80Us while the NATO can have up to 4 L2A4s? You might say: wow, T-80Us have a cannon with AP power 11! But please note that T-80Us also suffer a poor accuracy of 8!

And why T-72s have a sooooooooooooo low accuracy of 3? Are you joking? Third generation tanks have a accuracy of 15%? And why does T-72Bs have a thin armour of only 7 in the front? This has made this tank literally worth not deploying.

There's your problem. Play BOTH sides equally (as I do) and you'll notice just how balanced the faction-balance really is.

Nuff said!


@ OP

OP, you think you've been "cheated" by the DEVS of this game?....

Yes, these guys also do a great (even better probably) job at supporting their games. But their budgets aren't exactly the same either

_________________

Clan LVA - http://www.legiova.com
Youtube - http://www.youtube.com/user/Selk4res

Monk

I'd just quote everything you said but then I'd have to edit myself...


+1

I really hate the 2012 gamer