It is currently Wed 22 May 2013 22:45

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue 24 Apr 2012 17:48 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 20 Apr 2012 19:02
Posts: 1026
All AA Choppers are for emergencies, they arent meant to fight for air superiority above a battlefield.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 24 Apr 2012 20:48 
Offline
First Sergeant

Joined: Tue 14 Feb 2012 22:54
Posts: 223
that's the polish chopper we're talking about? yeah it really sucks with a weak autocanon and poor atgm and poor AA

drop the pricce, make him good at one aspect at leastor replace his atgm by rockets. There is no use for an expensive jack of all traddes decent at none

_________________
Quote:
Had heavy tanks been buffed there would not have been a need for a vts1 nerf.

Quote:
so long as there's no AA ,your Havocs/Apaches should be ruling the skies unless you're absolute rubbish with them.

Boogie Van on balance talk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 24 Apr 2012 21:15 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Tue 8 Nov 2011 22:40
Posts: 1271
The devs goes for some reason bananas when they try to put a price on something that has both an autocannon and ATGMs, no matter what quality either has.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 17:37 
Online
Major

Joined: Tue 5 Jul 2011 01:46
Posts: 1965
As everybody else has said it's crazy bad. A very overpriced unit. There are very few times you'd ever want to take one.

The OH-58S is cheaper and actually does something, and it's still a pretty poor option for NATO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 18:22 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Tue 8 Nov 2011 22:40
Posts: 1271
Honestly, if they halfed the cost to 25 / 30 (possibly 35 for the later variant to make the previous attractive at all) for the two variants, it would feel about right. The cheaper variant would be comparable to the gazelle canon but slower and worse accuracy (the most important stats on the gazelle, imo) but with a ATGM that *might* be useful with some vet. The AA version wouldn't be op compared to the OH-58C/S considering it would be unusable without vet and still have a very weak missle.

BTW, shouldn't the P, V and VP versions of the be priced the same at 85? The powerful rockets are at least as useful as the extra atgms and the ac of the VP is roughly as good as the machinegun (maybe give the mg a accuracy boost to make it stand out)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 18:36 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Fri 20 Apr 2012 19:02
Posts: 1026
Gronank wrote:
Honestly, if they halfed the cost to 25 / 30 (possibly 35 for the later variant to make the previous attractive at all) for the two variants, it would feel about right. The cheaper variant would be comparable to the gazelle canon but slower and worse accuracy (the most important stats on the gazelle, imo) but with a ATGM that *might* be useful with some vet. The AA version wouldn't be op compared to the OH-58C/S considering it would be unusable without vet and still have a very weak missle.

BTW, shouldn't the P, V and VP versions of the be priced the same at 85? The powerful rockets are at least as useful as the extra atgms and the ac of the VP is roughly as good as the machinegun (maybe give the mg a accuracy boost to make it stand out)


But at a considerable lower cost it would become a spammable unit, they will cause havoc to retreating/repairing targets with their ATGMS. At least the Gazelle has weak accuracy and ap. Im not even sure if the Gnie should be a competitor at all. There will always be units at the lower end of the stick and i wouldnt like it if the game turns in yet another balance saga.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 18:55 
Offline
First Sergeant

Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2012 20:59
Posts: 241
Location: People's Republic of Poland
Misfit wrote:
Gronank wrote:
But at a considerable lower cost it would become a spammable unit, they will cause havoc to retreating/repairing targets with their ATGMS. At least the Gazelle has weak accuracy and ap. Im not even sure if the Gnie should be a competitor at all. There will always be units at the lower end of the stick and i wouldnt like it if the game turns in yet another balance saga.


Right now this unit have no use. My solution to make gniewosz and its nato counterpart SEMI-USEFULL would be adding them improved optics ONLY against aircraft units to fit their role slithly better (it would be something like combat/air recon to fast react against enemy aircrafts, with its poor speed and horrible combat ability gniewosz still would be weak, but it could find some use. Its nato counterpart could additionally be anti-aircraft sniper)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 19:02 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Tue 8 Nov 2011 22:40
Posts: 1271
Misfit wrote:
But at a considerable lower cost it would become a spammable unit, they will cause havoc to retreating/repairing targets with their ATGMS. At least the Gazelle has weak accuracy and ap. Im not even sure if the Gnie should be a competitor at all. There will always be units at the lower end of the stick and i wouldnt like it if the game turns in yet another balance saga.

It might become a little more powerful than expected, vetted it would probably be the poor-man's airborne ATGM choice nr 1 but I can't really see a problem with that. Currently, the only real combat use of helicopters, with exception of maybe havoc and apache, is stunning rocket barrages. Airborne ATGMs, as the game currently is, are more of a "You don't have proper AA, therefore you die... maybe" weapon. Considering the salamandra and gniewosz has the atgm range of a flakpanzer gepard and 5 hitpoints, if you die to their ATGMs, you'll die anything flying at all.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 25 Apr 2012 20:39 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 20:27
Posts: 1305
FLX wrote:
PACT has more reliable ground AAA than the OTAN (9K37, 9K33, Tugunska), feels balanced to me that NATO has better Air to air options. BTW the bast AA heli for the pact is the Mi24P : a 30mm gun with 400rpm hurts. For the same price 2 Cobra AH-1S will still beat it but with 10HP you have enough time to shoot one of them and fall back.
The Mi24P will beat any other heli 1v1

PACT has better SAM units, while NATO has better AAA.

_________________
Support better and more accurate aircraft loadouts.

If you have trouble viewing videos on YouTube because they are blocked in your country, try using this proxy service.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu 26 Apr 2012 03:12 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Wed 22 Feb 2012 05:29
Posts: 39
Why is the oh58 range not 4.2 km like the chap. They're the same missile.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group