Joskip. What youre saying actually intrigues me ALOT. Add me on steam man

Deltafox209

when i get net back i know another person thatd absolutely love this idea

_________________


TOW Missiles, SABOT Rounds, Hellfires, Delta Force, Depleted Uranium Armor. There's enough to go around...

Thats cool.....but the emphasis was on modern, expensive tanks. Maybe i should have been more clear, it was too easy to miss in the sentence.
Good effort though.

Only tanks i use usually Are platoons of Abrams with M3 CFV's in pairs behind them.

Iraq Invasion style lol. Lot of open ground those M3's make life easy for the abrams. Its ALMOST as if units "communicate" sometimes

_________________


TOW Missiles, SABOT Rounds, Hellfires, Delta Force, Depleted Uranium Armor. There's enough to go around...

I want to have the Ontos in game

Great. I don't really use steam all that much but I'll look into it and add you. Tell me if your friend wants me to add him too or if either of you has a new idea for a deck (or perhaps already made a nice one) or battle to roleplay. Or of course if you have anything else to say that's fine too.






Ah in that case my comment was rather stupid, I guess I should read more thoroughly. Anyway, the Challenger 1 is your best bet then, in combination with good recon and artillery. Even with ATGM it won't go down (at least not in a single blow) and the artillery can blow any kind of atgm to smithereens (I continuously notice that playing as the ATGM using side). For me the magic of a tank in no way is it's main gun or offensive capabilities, it's it ability to take hits. Hits that would have destroyed your lighter units, the actual units that fend off an attack or secure an area.





Even if it sucked (I hate recoilless rifles) it would still look awesome in-game.

Cold war wise there were very few T72, T62, T55 series for the soviet offensive in Europe.

_________________

We need more missilez code for the missilez god.
Praslovan:
"Tactical Ikalugin inbound on this position in 10... 9..."

Btw MAD MAT, your PDF table appears to have wrong numbers for tank companies.

_________________

We need more missilez code for the missilez god.
Praslovan:
"Tactical Ikalugin inbound on this position in 10... 9..."

This is true for Soviet forces in East Germany as far as I can tell. I know pretty much nothing about Soviet offensive plans in Europe, but I was wondering whether the following is true:

- assuming a quick escalation, from peace to full-scale war, only the forces in the two German states would be involved due to time constraints

- now if we assume there is a prolonged (a few months or even a year) period of rising tension leading up to war, would the Soviets and their Pact allies deploy the units from the territory east of the Oder. Was there an option to strategically redeploy units from internal Soviet military districts to Western Europe, given enough time. Same question for allied units. Were there any plans to deploy Romanian, Czechoslovak, Bulgarian or Hungarian units for an attack on West Germany? I know very little, but IIRC, the Soviet war plans generally only included GSFG, the NVA and parts of the LWP (Ludowe Wojsko Polskie, Polish Army) .

That's not "mine" actually, but what is the error?

_________________

Company size is wrong. Soviet tank company was 10 or 13 tanks, including company commander, hence normal battalions were either 31 tank or 40 tanks.

_________________

We need more missilez code for the missilez god.
Praslovan:
"Tactical Ikalugin inbound on this position in 10... 9..."