It is currently Mon 20 May 2013 03:47

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 12:57 
Offline
Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sun 6 May 2012 11:06
Posts: 58
Location: Norway
How many heavy tanks do you have in your deck? I.e: Abrahams (how many unlocks), Leopard 2s (how many versions unlocked), etc.?

In my NATO deck I have two versions of the Abrahams and two of the Leopard 2, but I am wondering if I am not wasting a slot for something else.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 13:35 
Offline
Second-Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2011 19:19
Posts: 948
I personally stick with only Leo2 series. Abrams are severly outperformed by both challengers and Leo2, so there's no point in getting them.

However, if you find yourself often defending and having a relatively static playstyle, you might want to try out the challenger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 16:28 
Offline
Master Sergeant

Joined: Thu 16 Feb 2012 17:16
Posts: 196
I have Leo2 and Challenger. Leo2 gets used every game, Challenger pretty rarely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 20:02 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Tue 14 Feb 2012 20:06
Posts: 1286
Cygnus wrote:
I personally stick with only Leo2 series. Abrams are severly outperformed by both challengers and Leo2, so there's no point in getting them.

I wouldn't say that they're that inferior to Challengers, but whent they're getting shot by 11 AP shells, it sucks to be them. Even the T-64BV's, as I mentioned in the other thread, give them a run for their "money".

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 20:22 
Offline
Second-Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2011 19:19
Posts: 948
You do realize that Leo2A4 and challenger take the same frontal damage from T-80Us, right? I mean, being a challenger doesn't magically give you 11 front armor or something. You just get more side armor, but if you're being shot at the side armor by a T-80U, they're both screwed.

Challengers are severly outperformed by Leo2A4 because of the difference in fuel efficiency and the 10 AP gun of Leo2A4.
Also, T-64BVs don't stand a chance against Leo2A4s. Are we playing the same game?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 20:31 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Tue 14 Feb 2012 20:06
Posts: 1286
Cygnus wrote:
You do realize that Leo2A4 and challenger take the same frontal damage from T-80Us, right? I mean, being a challenger doesn't magically give you 11 front armor or something. You just get more side armor, but if you're being shot at the side armor by a T-80U, they're both screwed.

Challengers are severly outperformed by Leo2A4 because of the difference in fuel efficiency and the 10 AP gun of Leo2A4.
Also, T-64BVs don't stand a chance against Leo2A4s. Are we playing the same game?

You said:
Cygnus wrote:
Abrams are severly outperformed by both challengers and Leo2

I replied:
DiabloTigerSix wrote:
I wouldn't say that they're that inferior to Challengers, but whent they're getting shot by 11 AP shells, it sucks to be them. Even the T-64BV's, as I mentioned in the other thread, give them a run for their "money".

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 20:50 
Offline
Second-Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2011 19:19
Posts: 948
I thought it referred to Leo2 series. It wasn't very clear.
But yeah Abrams suck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 17 Jun 2012 22:27 
Offline
Sergeant

Joined: Mon 16 Apr 2012 18:45
Posts: 73
It seems like all uses Leos 2a4s hich is boring since you never face anything else than that. Thats why i love Pact T64s can be just as good as T80s and T72 can also be quite good :lol:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 18 Jun 2012 09:42 
Offline
Second-Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2011 19:19
Posts: 948
Quote:
and T72 can also be quite good


Abandon thread!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 18 Jun 2012 09:54 
Offline
Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sun 6 May 2012 11:06
Posts: 58
Location: Norway
Well, a T-72 costs 45 somethings. Fully vetted the accuracy is almost as if it had 9 instead of 3. The cost of fully vetted should be 90 somethings. This is the same cost as the basic T-80 model. There are still differences, of course, but maybe a high vet T-72 can in fact substitute for a T-80?

The T-80 is a Big tank which is easier to hit, i.e. attacking units get +1 on their accuracy when shooting at it, according to The Big Chart. The T-72 is Medium, there is no accuracy boost for the enemy.


Last edited by Argel_Tal on Mon 18 Jun 2012 09:57, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group