The issue with point games is that the end is anti-climatic. I had a match where both of us are having an epic battle for the center but the game suddenly ended due to the point requirement being achieved. I wanted to see who would have won that battle...

Timed games if timed long enough like 30 mins would give every battle that perfect ending they deserve.

honestly I don't see the point why there shouldn't be more victory conditions. The 1.5 k as sole condition is narrowing gameplay. Don't get me wrong: I see the challenge in there and I appreciate it. But I don't see viable arguments why victory conditions shouldn't cycle like maps do. Keep the 1.5 k one, add some more.

There were already a millions propositions made. Personally I'd back a more combat mission oriented play style: add holding "flags"/terrain as victory points while keeping the ratio of lost/destroyed units in. Like 50% to "flags" and 50% to unit k/d ratio.

Just my five cent

_________________
please nerf stone!! It is massively overpowered! And completely out of balance!

paper is fine.

Yours, scissors.

@Leviathan, Agreed diversify gameplay to keep it fun!

just add new gamemodes that for instance need you to hold a town that gives you 2x more resources or whatever!

just add more types of games

Yes, which brings me to my original thread starting post - is Eugen looking into this? Please!!!

So now what to do?
Put up a new petition thread and make people sign so that Eugen sees how desperately the community wants this?

You have my support. I'll sign it.

The victory conditions are fine imho.

_________________

An extra one won't hurt, right?

As long as it's x amount extra and not replacing the current one.

_________________