Cygnus wrote:I personally stick with only Leo2 series. Abrams are severly outperformed by both challengers and Leo2, so there's no point in getting them.
Cygnus wrote:You do realize that Leo2A4 and challenger take the same frontal damage from T-80Us, right? I mean, being a challenger doesn't magically give you 11 front armor or something. You just get more side armor, but if you're being shot at the side armor by a T-80U, they're both screwed.
Challengers are severly outperformed by Leo2A4 because of the difference in fuel efficiency and the 10 AP gun of Leo2A4.
Also, T-64BVs don't stand a chance against Leo2A4s. Are we playing the same game?
Cygnus wrote:Abrams are severly outperformed by both challengers and Leo2
DiabloTigerSix wrote:I wouldn't say that they're that inferior to Challengers, but whent they're getting shot by 11 AP shells, it sucks to be them. Even the T-64BV's, as I mentioned in the other thread, give them a run for their "money".
and T72 can also be quite good
©2013 Eugen Systems and Focus Home Interactive. Developed by Eugen Systems and published by Focus Home Interactive. Wargame: AirLand Battle, Focus, Focus Home Interactive and their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Focus Home Interactive. All rights reserved. IRISZOOM is a trademark of Ubisoft Entertainment in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other names, trademarks and logos are property of their respective owners