the guys who not all in have time to respond.

You have a closer spawn point. Take advantage of that...

_________________

If you don't spend most of your money until after you've scouted what your enemy is doing you again end up at big disadvantage vs a regular player who takes land and digs in on an income advantage while you don't have any units.

I agree this is probably the least-bad response when you have reason to think you're playing someone who is going to rush you, but I've experience of doing it and it puts you well behind and out of position against normal play.

disagree with you about a normal player plaetoniu... it seams that you only know frontal attack...

_________________

Correction - most people who bought it wanted chess, and they have since moved on to other games.

Most people here, like playing rocket-paper-scissors and think that it's the height of strategy.

maybe cause you dftly don't understand how it works space... sorry for you.. you don't like i and want to play it? cool but why do you continue to come there?

_________________

And after that, you claim that you are not a troll? Ad hominem attacks are not the height of argumentation!

I'm not sure what you mean by that.

The problem is rather that attacking is hard and usually incurs greater losses. If I have minimal units on the field the enemy will be able to secure more points at the start, either because I just don't feel comfortable moving out, or because he will win the initial skirmishes. I will then either have to attack him to win some of them back, or I will have to accept having an income disadvantage that will increasingly weaken me as time goes on.

you really only know attacks right in the front of the opponent army... and you forget one think.. if opponent spam rush, it's an all in.. if not buying command AFTEr don't make you lose so much things..

_________________

I'm not even following what DO is saying anymore.

Who is DO?